ЕМГ – активність м’язів верхньої кінцівки людини при патології нервово-м’язового проведення
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2617-4723-2019-388-4-168-178Анотація
In many cases of a disease or an injury of the upper extremity nerve impulses are impaired. The high level of diagnostic and tactical errors in upper limb's nerve damage often leads to poor treatment outcomes. An important, and sometimes decisive, factor in the choice of treatment is the assessment of the functional state of the nerves and muscles of the affected limb segment. The purpose of this testing is to study the features of the upper limb muscles's EMG activity in normal and in the case of clinical pathology of neuromuscular transmission.
24 volunteers between the ages of 17 and 32, both male and female, with the right profile of manual asymmetry took part in the study. While dividing into groups, the presence of the diagnosted pathology of the upper right limb's neuromuscular transmission was taken into account. Accordingly, we created a "pathological" (n = 8) and "healthy" (n = 16) groups. In both groups, we sequentially recorded the M-response of the abductor pollicis brevis during stimulation of the nerve medianus as well as the M-response of the abductor digiti minimi during stimulation of the nerve ulnaris. The M-response amplitude, residual latency (RL), and excitation propagation rate (EPR) were analyzed.
It has been established that the amplitudes of the M-responce during EMG stimulation of the abductor pollicis brevis and the abductor digiti minimi were lower in pathological group than tin normal. According to our results, RL of examined muscles' M-response increased with distanting away from the stimulation point (muscle's working point). In the case of pathology we observed longer RL of M-responce than in healthy testees. In the case of stimulation of the abductor pollicis brevis EPR was comparely higher on the elbow-shoulder segment and the wrist-shoulder segment in the pathological group, wereas while stimulation of the abductor digiti minimi we established inverse relationship. EPR in all segments, namely the wrist-shoulder and elbow-shoulder, was lower in the pathologic group compared to the norm.
Посилання
2. Zhivolupov, S. A. (2000). Travmaticheskie porazheniya nervnyih stvolov konechnostey i spleteniy (patogenez, klinika, diagnostika i lechenie). [Traumatic lesions of nerve trunks of limbs and plexuses (pathogenesis, clinic, diagnosis and treatment).]: avtoref. dis. . d-ra med. nauk. VMedA: SPb; 43 s. (In Russion)
3. Kovrazhkina, E.A. Aksonalnyie polineyropatii: patogenez i lechenie. [Axonal polyneuropathies: pathogenesis and treatment.]. Zhurnal nevrologii i psihiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova; 2013, 6, 22–25. (In Russion)
4. Campbell, W.W. Evaluation and management of peripheral nerve injury. Clinical Neurophysiology; 2008, 119, 1951–1965.
5. Kimura, J. (2001). Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle: principles and practice. Edition 3. Oxford University Press: New York;991 p.
6. Sivous, G. I.; Strokov, I. A.; Kasatkina, E. P. (2002). Diabeticheskaya perifericheskaya sensorno-motornaya polinevropatiya u detey i podrostkov, neyrofiziologiya, patogenez, klinika, diagnostika: posobie dlya vrachey. [Diabetic peripheral sensory-motor polyneuropathy in children and adolescents, neurophysiology, pathogenesis, clinic, diagnostics: a guide for doctors.]. Konsalta: Moskva; 27 s. (In Russion)
7. Lyikoshina, L.E.; Shevelev, I.N.; Tissen, T.P. Vyizvannyie potentsialyi v diagnostike travmaticheskih povrezhdeniy plechevogo spleteniya. [Evoked potentials in the diagnosis of traumatic injuries of the brachial plexus.]. Zhurn. neyrohirurgii im. N.N. Burdenko; 1992, 2–3, 28–33. (In Russion)
8. Kempler, P. (2002). Neuropathies: pathomechanism, clinical presentation, diagnosis, therapy. Springer: Budapest; 308 р.
9. Atman, O. V. (2015). PatafIzIologIya: pIdruchnik: u 2-h t. PatafIzIologIya organIv I sistem. [Pathophysiology: a textbook: in 2 volumes. Pathophysiology of organs and systems.]. Nova kniga: VInnitsya; 528 s. (In Ukrainian)
10. Zenkov, L. R.; Ronkin, M. A. (2004). Funktsionalnaya diagnostika nervnyih bolezney: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachey. [Functional Diagnosis of Nervous Diseases: A Guide for Physicians.]. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. MEDpress-inform: Moskva; 488 s. (In Russion)
11. Robinson, A. J.; Kellog, R. (2007) Clinical electrophysiology: electrotherapy and electrophysiological testing. 3 ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: New York; 555 р.
12. Tsyimbalyuk, V. I.; Mogila, V. V.; Nikolas, Zh. I. Printsipyi hirurgicheskogo lecheniya pri travmaticheskih povrezhdeniyah sredinnogo nerva na raznyih urovnyah. [Principles of surgical treatment for traumatic injuries of the median nerve at different levels.]. UkraYinskiy medichniy chasopis; 2005, 3, S. 64–68. (In Russion)
13. Brown, W.F.; Bolton, C.F.; Aminoff, M.J. (2002). Neuromuscular function and desease: basic, clinical and electrodiagnostic aspects. WB Saunders Company: New York; 1–2, 2160 p.
14. Kurinnyi, I.M. (2009). Naslidky polistrukturnoi travmy verkhnoi kintsivky ta yikh khirurhichne likuvannia: [Consequences of upper limb polystructural injury and their surgical treatment]: dys. d-ra med. nauk: 14.01.21 / ITO AMNU: Kyiv; 321 s. (In Ukrainian)
15. Strafun, S. S.; Haiko, O. H. Diahnostyka ta dynamika vidnovlennia travmatychnoho ushkodzhennia promenevoho. [Diagnosis and dynamics of recovery of traumatic radiation damage.]. Visnyk ortopedii, travmatolohii ta protezuvannia; 2009, 1, 20–26. (In Ukrainian)
16. Kapilevich, L. V. (2005). Metodyi funktsionalno-diagnosticheskih issledovaniy: uchebnoe posobie. [Methods of functional diagnostic research: a training manual.]. SibGMU: Tomsk; 2005, 154 s. (In Russion)
17. Nikolaev, S. G. (2003). Praktikum po klinicheskoy elektromiografii. [Clinical Electromyography Workshop.]. Ivanovo; 264 s. (In Russion)
18. Meigal, A.I.; Rissanen, S.; Tarvainen, M.P.; Karjalainen, P.A.; Iudina-Vassel, I.A.; Airaksinen, O.; Kankaanpää, M. Novel parameters of surface EMG in patients with parkinson’s disease and healthy young and old controls. Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology; 2008,19(3), 206–213.
19. Aminoff, M.J. Electrophysiologic testing for the diagnosis of peripheral nerve injures. Anesthesiology; 2004, 100 (5), 1298–1303.
20. Calabrò, R. S.; Cacciola, A.; Berté, F.; Manuli, A.; Leo, A. Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: where are we now? Neurological Sciences: Official Journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology; 2016, 37(4), 503–514.