The tension of the epidemic situation regarding campylobacteriosis in Ukraine from 2011 to 2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2617-4723-2022-1-1-13Keywords:
campylobacteriosis, gastrointestinal infections, toxic infection, epidemic situation, laboratory diagnosticsAbstract
The article presents the results of studying the epidemic situation of campylobacteriosis in Ukraine from 2011 to 2021. The data on the incidence of this infection in people of different ages in the administrative regions of Ukraine has many indications. Namely: the disease has an uneven Spatio-temporal manifestation and is registered sporadically mainly with food and waterways of the pathogen's transmission mechanism.
The material for the study was the statistical data of the official reports of the state institutions of the Sanitary and Epidemiological Service (SES) and the State Food and Consumer Service. Since 2005, the incidence of campylobacteriosis has been 0.27–0.5 prosantimile. The situation is epidemiological campylobacteriosis in Ukraine has nothing to do with the actual situation of this infection and objectively shows a low level of laboratory diagnosis.
In the nosological structure of infectious diseases in the population in Ukraine during 2011-2017, the proportion of campylobacteriosis did not exceed 0.2%. Contrasting morbidity levels characterized epidemiological situations into individual nosological forms and their uneven territorial distribution. The tensest epidemic situation was in the Odessa region. The median incidence of acute intestinal infections caused by other established pathogens exceeded the average Ukrainian.
According to the official reports of the State Food and Consumer Service of Ukraine, monitoring of infectious diseases based on the results of microbiological studies for the period from 2011 to 2020 shows that campylobacteriosis in farm animals and poultry was not registered. The epizootological situation of campylobacteriosis in animals is stably prosperous for an extended period.
The archive of reporting data of the Volyn Health Center on the epidemiological condition of campylobacteriosis in the Volyn region showed that from 2011 to 2021, the disease was not diagnosed. The reason for this situation is the insufficient level of bacteriological diagnosis.
Our further research will focus on developing laboratory diagnostics of campylobacteriosis and the diagnosis of systemic epidemiological surveillance of the disease. It should include microbiological monitoring of this infection.
References
Benoit, S.R.; Lopez, B.; Arvelo, W.; Henao, O.; Parsons, M. B.; Reyes, L.; Moir, J. C.; Lindblade, K. Burden of laboratory-confirmed Campylobacter infections in Guatemala 2008-2012: results from a facility-based surveillance system. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health. 2014, Mar 4 (1), pp 51–59.
Bouwknegt, M.; Van Pelt, W.; Havelaar, A. H. Scoping the impact of changes in population age-structure on the future burden of foodborne disease in the Netherlands, 2020-2060. Internet J. Environ Res Public Health. [Online] 2013, Jul 11, 10 (7), 2888–2896. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3734465/ (accessed Feb 1, 2022).
Campylobacter. World Health Organization. URL: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/campylobacter(accessed Feb 2, 2022).
Crim, S. M.; Iwamoto, M.; Huang, J. Y.; Griffin, P. M.; Gilliss, D.; Cronquist, A. B.; Cartter, M.; Tobin-D'Angelo, M.; Blythe, D.; Smith, K.; Lathrop, S.; Zansky, S.; Cieslak, P. R.; Dunn, J.; Holt, K. G.; Lance, S.; Tauxe, R.; Henao, O. L. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Incidence and trends of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food-Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 U.S. sites, 2006-2013. Internet. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. [Online] 2014, Apr 18, 63 (15), 328–332. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24739341/ (accessed Feb 3, 2022).
Hauri, A. M.; Just, M.; McFarland, S.; Schweigmann, A.; Schlez, K.; Krahn, J.; Campylobacteriose-Ausbrüche in Hessen, 2005-2011 – und immer wieder Rohmilch [Campylobacteriosis outbreaks in the state of Hesse, Germany, 2005-2011: raw milk yet again]. Internet. J. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. [Online] 2013, Feb 138 (8), 357–360. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23404322/ (accessed Feb 4, 2022).
Kubota, K.; Kasuga, F.; Iwasaki, E.; Inagaki, S.; Sakurai, Y.; Komatsu, M.; Toyofuku, H.; Angulo, F. J.; Scallan, E.; Morikawa, K. Estimating the burden of acute gastroenteritis and foodborne illness caused by Campylobacter, Salmonella, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus by using population-based telephone survey data, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan, 2005 to 2006. Internet J. Food Prot. [Online] 2011, Oct 74 (10), 1592–1598. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22004803/ (accessed Feb 5, 2022).
Sadkowska-Todys, M.; Kucharczyk, B. Campylobacteriosis in Poland in 2012. Internet J. Przegl Epidemiol. [Online] 2014, 68 (2), 239–241; 349–351. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25135507/ (accessed Feb 6, 2022).
Steens, A.; Eriksen, H. M.; Blysta,d H. What are the most important infectious diseases among those ≥65 years: a comprehensive analysis on notifiable diseases, Norway, 1993–2011. Internet J. BMC Infect Dis. [Online] 2014, 14. Article 57. URL: https:// bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2334-14-57 (accessed Feb 7, 2022).
Weinberger, M.; Lerner, L.; Valinsky, L.; Moran-Gilad, J.; Nissan, I.; Agmon, V.; Peretz, C.; Increased incidence of Campylobacter spp. infection and high rates among children, Israel. Internet J. Emerg Infect Dis. [Online] 2013, Nov 19 (11), 1828–1831. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24188185/ (accessed Feb 8, 2022).
Duda, O. K.; Vovk, I. O. Kampilobakterioz – «nova» problema v klinici kyshkovyh infekcij? Medix Anti-Aging. 2015, 5–6, (121–122). URL: https://www.health-medix.com/ articles/misteztvo/2015-10-04/infect.pdf (data zvernennja: 23.11.2021) (in Ukrainian).
Infekcijni hvoroby. Kurs lekcij: navch. posibnyk / Je.V. Nikitin, K. L. Servec'kyj, T. V. Chaban [ta in.]. ONMedU: Odesa, 2012; 255 s. ) (in Ukrainian).
Infekcionnye bolezni u detej: uchebnik dlja pediatricheskih fakul'tetov medicinskih vuzov / pod red. prof. V.N. Timchenko. 4-e izd., ispr. i dop. SpecLit: SPb., 2012: 623 s. (in Russian.
Kampilobakterioz. URL: https://www.wiki.uk-ua.nina.az/Kampilobakterioz.html (data zvernennja: 30.11.2021) (in Ukrainian).
Kasjanenko, O. I.; Gusjev, V. O.; Kasjanenko, S. M.; Nagorna, L. V.; Pun'ko, I. V. Vyznachennja rivnja infikuvannja zabijnoi' ptyci mikroorganizmamy SAMPYLOBACTER spp. Veterynarna biotehnologija. 2019, № 34, s 59–66 (in Ukrainian).
Kyryk, D. L. Kliniko-epidemiologichni osoblyvosti kampilobakteriozu v Ukrai'ni. Ukr. med. Chasopys. 2013, vyp. 95, № 3, s 162–164 (in Ukrainian).
Kyryk, D. L. Mikrobiologichna diagnostyka kampilobakterioznoi' infekcii'. Zb. nauk. prac' spivrobit. NMAPO imeni P.L.Shupyka. 2016, № 26, s 580-586 (in Ukrainian).
Kyryk, D. L. Organizacija kompleksnogo epidemiologichnogo nagljadu za kampilobakteriozom v suchasnyh umovah. Vrachebnoe delo. 2017, № 1–2, s 120–124 (in Ukrainian).
Kyryk, D. L. Harakterystyka dejakyh biologichnyh vlastyvostej kampilobakterij riznogo pohodzhennja ta i'h vplyv na epidemichnyj proces kampilobakteriozu. UKR. MED. ChASOPYS. 2011, № 2(82), s 111–113 (in Ukrainian).
Kozhna druga proba kurjachogo m’jasa infikovana bakterijamy grupy kyshkovoi' palychky. DU «Volyns'kyj OLC MOZ Ukrai'ny» URL: https://volindses.com.ua/kozhna-druga-proba-kurjachogo-mjasa-infi/ (data zvernennja: 05.02.2022) (in Ukrainian).
Malysh, N. G. Evoljucija epidemichnogo procesu gostryh kyshkovyh infekcij bakterial'noi' etiologii', faktory ryzyku, udoskonalennja epidemiologichnogo nagljadu. Dysertacija na zdobuttja naukovogo stupenja doktora medychnyh nauk za special'nistju 14.02.02 Epidemiologija (222 Medycyna). Sumy, 2020; 406 s. (in Ukrainian).
Pinchuk, N. G.; Pustovit, N. A. Kampilobakterioz jak vazhlyva harchova toksykoinfekcija. Veterynarna medycyna. 2018, № 2, s 136–140 (in Ukrainian).
Pustovit, N. A.; Pinchuk, N. G.; Kudrjavchenko, O. P. Elektronno-mikroskopichne doslidzhennja izoljativ CAMPILOBACTER vydilenyh z produktiv ptahivnyctva. Veterynarna biotehnologija. 2018, № 32(1), s 202–206 (in Ukrainian).
Pustovit, N. A. Rozrobka ta udoskonalennja zasobu indykacii' kampilobakterij. Veterynarna biotehnologija. 2016, № 29, s 219–226 (in Ukrainian).
Fotina, T. I.; Fotina, G. A.; Klishhova, Zh. E.; Aref’jev, V. L.; Chemych, O. M. Rol' monitoryngu ta kontrolju za toksykoinfekcijamy ta toksykozamy u zabezpechenni biobezpeky naselennja Ukrai'ny. Veterynarna biotehnologija. 2018, № 32(2), s 585–592 (in Ukrainian).
Jakubchak, O. M.; Lapa, O. Ju. Doslidzhennja kampilobakterij v ob’jektah dovkillja. Veterynarna medycyna. 2015, № 101, s 98–100 (in Ukrainian).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
