CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ECOLOGICAL ROLE OF UNDERPASSES FOR ANIMALS ON THE H-31 ROUTE IN THE DNIPROPETROVSK REGION

Authors

  • Oleg Hristov Company Research Center “Dnipro Natural Inspection”
  • Galina Zadorozhna Dnieper-Orilskiy’ Nature Reserve
  • Maria Trifanova Dnieper-Orilskiy’ Nature Reserve
  • Alexander Ponomarenko Dnieper-Orilskiy’ Nature Reserve

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/NCBio.21.1.65-74

Keywords:

highway, motor road, underpasses, wild animals, road deaths, living environment

Abstract

Roads are a powerful converter of the natural environment. Such objects block the paths of daily and seasonal migrations of higher animals. Ecological crossing structures for animals are used on modern roads to reduce animal mortality and traffic safety. The aim of this paper is to monitor the effectiveness of the use of animal crossings under the highway built on modern technologies in Ukraine.
The material was collected during 2020 on the newly built section of the H-31 highway. The studied area is located between the village of Loboykivka and active construction near the village of Protochi in the Dnipropetrovsk region (Ukraine). The species composition of the animals was assessed by their paw prints and their excrement. To account for animal tracks in the underpasses, artificial control earthen strips 2 m wide were created.
We investigated 10 underpasses and 11 aqueducts (pipe culverts) and a culvert located in the river of the Chaplynka River. Traces of 6 species of large and medium-sized wild animals (foxes, wild boars, ferrets, weasels, martens, roe deer), footprints of micromammalia, as well as domestic animals (domestic cats, dogs, cows) were recorded. No traces of wild animals were found in the underpasses located in the immediate vicinity of the villages and active construction. The reason is a large anthropogenic load.
All the studied transitions are located in the human-transformed part of the landscape, in places with high population density and lack of ecosystems with protective qualities.
The pipe culverts of the investigated section of the H-31 route have a better location. Water pipes are used by animals more often than underpasses. Pipe culverts are used by the same species of animals of medium size as the transitions underpasses, but the number of passages of animals is much larger.
The presence of natural substrate in the transition and vegetation at the entrance to the transition or aque-duct increases the efficiency of their use by animals qualitatively and quantitatively.

References

1. Romin, L.A.; Bissonette, J.A. Deer-vehicle collisions: status of statemonitoring activities and mitigation efforts. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 1996; 24. рр. 276–283.
2. Forman, R.T.T.; Sperling, D.; Bissonette, J.A.; Clevenger, A.P.; Cutshall, C.D.; Dale, V.H.; Fahrig, L.; France, R.; Goldman, C.R.; Heanue, K.; Jones, J.A.; Swanson, F.J.; Turrentine, T.;Winter, T.C. Road Ecology; Science and Solutions. Island Press, Washington DC, 2003. 123 с.
3. Dolejsh, K. Sledy zverej i ptic. M.: Agropromizdat, 1987. 224 s. (in Russian)
4. Zagorodnjuk, І.V. Polovij viznachnik drіbnih ssavcіv Ukraїni. [Field determinant of small mammals of Ukraine] Pracі Terіologіchnoї shkoli; vipusk 5; Kiїv, 2002. 60 s. (in Ukrainian)
5. Formozov, A.N. Sputnik sledopyta, [] Izd. 7-e, dop.; M.: KomKniga, 2006. 368 s. (in Russian)
6. Gudkov, V.M. Sledy zverej i ptic [Footprints of animals and birds]. Jenciklopedicheskij spravochnik-opredelitel|; M.:Veche, 2013. 592 s. (in Russian)
7. Yanes, M.; Velasco, J.; Suarez, F. Permeability of roads and railways to vertebrates: the importance of culverts. Biological Conservation, 1995, 71,рр 217–222.
8. Rodriguez, A.; Crema, G.; Delibes, M. Use of non-wildlife passages across a high-speed railway by terrestrial vertebrates. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996, 33, рр 1527–1540.
9. Clevenger, A.P.; Chruszcz, B.; Gunson, K. Drainage culverts as habitat linkages and factors affecting passage by mammals. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2001; 38(6), pр 1340-1349.
10. Dodd, Jr. C.K.; Barichivich, W.J.; Smith, L.L. Effectiveness of a barrier wall and culverts in reducing wildlife mortality on a heavily traveled highway in Florida. Biological Conservation, 2004, 118, рр 619–631.
11. Kaye, D.R.; Walsh, K.M.; Ross, C.C. Spotted turtle use of a culvert under relocated Route 44 in Carver, Massachusetts. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Ecology and Transportation, San Diego, CA, 2005, рр. 426–432.
12. Clevenger, A.P.; Chruszcz B.; Gunson, K. Drainage culverts as habitat linkages and factors affecting passage by mammals. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2001, 38(6), рp 1340-1349.
13. Taylor, B.D.; Goldingay, R.L. Wildlife road-kills on three major roads in northeastern New SouthWales. Wildlife Research, 2004, 31, рр 83–91.
14. Veenbaas, G.; Brandjes, J. Use of fauna passages along waterways under highways. In: Evink, G.L., Garrett, P., Zeigler, D., Berry, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Wildlife Ecology and Transportation. FL-ER-69-98. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, 1999. рр 253–258.
15. Glista, D.J.; DeVault T.L.; DeWoody,J.A. A review of mitigation measures for reducing wildlife mortality on roadways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2009, 91(1), рр 1-7.
16. Jackson, S.D. Overview of transportation related wildlife problems. In: Evink, G.L., Garrett, P., Zeigler, D., Berry, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Wildlife Ecology and Transportation. Florida Department оf Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, 2000. рр 1–4.
17. Lesbarreres, D.; Lode, T.; Merila, J. Short communication: what type ofamphibian tunnel could reduce road kills? Oryx, 2004, 38, рр 220–223.
18. Mougey, T. Des tunnels pour batraciens. Le Courier de la Nature, 1996, 155, рр. 22–28.
19. Ward, A.L. Mule deer behavior in relation to fencing and underpasses on Interstate 80 in Wyoming. Transportation Research Record, 1982, 859, рр 8–13.
20. Jaeger, J.A.G.; Fahrig, L. Effects of road fencing on population persistence. Conservation Biology, 200418, рр 1651–1657.
21. Pojar, T.M.; Prosence, R.A.; Reed, D.F.; Woodard, T.N. Effectiveness of a lighted, animated deer crossing sign. Journal of Wildlife Management, 1975, 39, рр 87–91.
22. Case, R.M. Interstate highway road-killed animals: a data source for biologists. Wildlife Society Bulletin 6,.Clevenger and Waltho, 2000, рр 8-13.
23. Bank, F.G.; Irwin, C.L.; Evink, G.L.; Gray, M.E.; Hagood, S.; Kinar, J.R.; Levy, A.; Paulson, D.; Ruediger, B.; Sauvajot, R.M.; Scott, D.J.; White, P. Wildlife habitat connectivity across European highways. Technical Report FWHA-PL-02-011. U.S, 2002, 64 p.
24. Jackson, S.D., Underpass systems foramphibians. In: Evink, G.L., Garrett, P., Zeigler, D., Berry, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Wildlife Ecology and Transportation. FL-ER-69-98. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, 1996. Р. 240–244.
25. Bekker, H., Hengel, V.D.B. and van der Sluijs, H. editors. Natuur over wegen. Nature over motorways. Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Delft, Netherlands. 1995.

Published

2021-09-15

How to Cite

Hristov, O., Zadorozhna, G., Trifanova, M., & Ponomarenko, A. (2021). CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ECOLOGICAL ROLE OF UNDERPASSES FOR ANIMALS ON THE H-31 ROUTE IN THE DNIPROPETROVSK REGION. Notes in Current Biology, (1 (1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.29038/NCBio.21.1.65-74