Age features of reactivity of the autonomic nervous system during the processing of information of different modality and intensity of signal presentation

Authors

  • Svitlana Bezkopylna Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2617-4723-2020-1-389-94-101

Keywords:

ontogenesis, cognitive functions, modality of signals, autonomous nervous system, correlative rhythmography, reactivity

Abstract

116 pupils participated in the investigation: children of the age 7–8, teenagers of the age 10–11 and 13–14 as well as youngsters of the the age 16–17 years. We investigated the interaction of the cognitive and the autoagenomous nervous systems on the condition of processing information in the goL/nogo/goR mode of  different modality and intensity of providing signals. The cognitive task included defining the signal modality (the form of the figure, or the meaning of the word), quick and unmistakable reaction with the left (goL) or the right (goR) hand or slowing the moving act (nogo). By the indicators of the non-linear analysis of the heart rhythm regulation: frequency (НR), the regulating area (S), periodical (SD2) and аpеrіоdical (SD1) fluctuations of the correlative rhythmography (CR) we studied the mechanisms of the autonomous nervous system regulation at rest and while processing the image and the verbal information in the gol/nogo/gor regime with different intensity of its providing.
Comparison of the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of doing cognitive and motor tasks of complex movement reactions of RV2-3 differentiation investigation results as well as indicators of the non-linear children’s, adolescents’ and youngsters’ SR regulation analysis allowed to find out different variants of the integrative brain functions and the ANS reactivity as the enforcement or lessening of their interaction. We have established being successful and the speed of doing tasks in processing and differentiating information in the RV2-3 regime as well as the reactivity of the ANS regulation mechanisms are dependent on the signal modality, the intensiveness of their display, and the age of the persons examined. The examined people of all age groups on condition of displaying verbal signals in the RV2-3 regime quantity of mistakes and the time of movement reactions is greater and the ANS reactivity is higher than to the image signals. The intensiveness of the image and the verbal information displaying an increase in the RV2-3 regime raises the number of mistakes, reduces the time of the movement reaction, and leads to the increase of the ANS regulation mechanisms reactivity. The youngsters’ quantity of mistakes, the time of complex movement reactions RV2-3, and the ANS reactivity are less than children’s and adolescents’ ones.

References

1. Lyzohub, V. S.; Chernenko, N. P.; Kozhemiako, T. V.; Palabiyik, А. А.; Bezkopylna, S. V. Vozrastnyye osobennosti vzaimodeystviya dvigatel'noy i kognitivnoy sistem mozga pri obrabotke informatsii razlichnoy modal'nosti i slozhnosti [Age peculiarities of interaction of motor and cognitive brain systems while processing information of different modality and complexity]. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems. 2019, 10(3), 288–294. DOI:10.15421/021944. (In Ukrainian)
2. Makarenko, M. V.; Lizohub, V. S.; Galka, M. S., Yuhimenko, L. I.; Khomenko, S. M. Method of psychophysiological evaluation of the functional state of the auditory analyzer. Patent. 96496 State Service for Intellectual Property of Ukraine, MPC A 61B5/16. №2010 02225; stated. 01.03.2010, published Nov10, 2011, Bul. No. 21
3. Goodwin, J. C.; Goodwin, K. A. Research in Psychology. Methods and Design. Danvers, MA, USA: John Wiley & Sons. 2016, 560.
4. Kirsch, W.; Hoffmann, J. Stimulus-dependent modulation of perceptual and motor learning in a serial reaction time task. Advances in Cognitive Psychology. 2012, V, 8(2), 155. DOI: 10.2478/v10053–008–0112–2
5. Levy-Tzedek, S.; Hanassy, S.; Abboud, S. et al. Fast, accurate reaching movements with a visual-to-auditory sensory substitution device. Restorative neurology and neuroscience. 2012, V, 30(4), 313. DOI: 10.3233/RNN-2012-110219
6. Broggin, E.; Savazzi, S.; Marzi, C. A. Similar effects of visual perception and imagery on simple reaction time Q.J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove). 2012, V, 65. Issue 1. 151. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.594896
7. Jensen, A. R. Clocking the Mind: Mental Chronometry and Individual Differences. Elsevier: Oxford (UK), Amsterdam (Netherlands), 2006, 272.
8. Baevsky, R. M. Problemy otsenki i prognozirovaniya funktsional'nogo sostoyaniya organizma i yego razvitiya v kosmicheskoy meditsine. [Problems of assessing and predicting the functional state of the organism and its development in space medicine]. Uspekhi Fiziologicheskikh Nauk. 2006, 37(3), 43–49. (In Russian)
9. Working Group of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Stimulation and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability: measurement standards, physiological interpretation and clinical use. SPb. Institute of Cardiol. Techniques. 2000, 82. (In Russian).
10. Makarenko, M. V. Metodika otsenki individual'nykh neyrodinamicheskikh kharakteristik vysshey nervnoy deyatel'nosti cheloveka [Method of estimation of individual neurodynamic characteristics of higher nervous activity in man]. Fiziolohichnyi zhurnal. 1999, 45(4), 123–131. (In Ukrainian).
11. Danilova, N. N.; Astafiev, S. V. Chelovecheskoye vnimaniye kak spetsificheskaya vzaimosvyaz' ritmov EEG i aktivnosti volny serdechnogo ritma. [Human attention as a specific correlation between the EEG rhythms and activity of heart rate wave]. Journal of higher nervous activity. 2000, 50(5), 791–800. (In Russian)
12. Guzik, P.; Piskorski, J.; Barthel, P.; Bauer, A.; Müller, A.; Junk, N.; Ulm, K.; Malik, M.; Schmidt, G. Heart rate deceleration runs for postinfarction risk prediction. J Electrocardiol. 2012, 45(1), 70–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2011.08.006
13. Gavrilova, E. A. Variabel'nost' serdechnogo ritma i sport. [Heart rate variability and sports]. Human Physiology. 2016, 41(5), 121–129. DOI: 10.7868/S0131164616050088.
(In Russian)
14. Leutin, V. P.; Nikolaeva, E. I. Psikhofiziologicheskiye mekhanizmy adaptatsii i funktsional'naya asimmetriya golovnogo mozga [Psychophysiological mechanisms of adaptation and functional asymmetry of the brain]. Science: Novosibirsk, 1988, 193. (In Russian)
15. Liston, C.; McEwen, B. S.; Casey, B. J. Psychosocial stress reversibly disrupts prefrontal processing and attentional control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009, V, 106, № 3. 912–914.
16. Donker, S.; Roerdink, M.; Greven, A.; & Beek, P. Regularity of center-of- pressure trajectories depends on the amount of attention invested in postural control. Experimental Brain Research, 2007, 181(1), 1–11. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0905-4
17. Doumas, M., Rapp, M. A.; & Krampe, R. T. Working memory and postural control: adult age differences in potential for improvement, task priority, and dual tasking. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences. 2009, 64, 193–201. DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbp009
18. Bernstein, N. A. Contemporary Studies on the Physiology of the Neural Process. Smysl: Moscow, 2003, 330. (In Russian)
19. Horak, F. B. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age and Ageing. 2006, 35(2), 7–11. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afl077
20. Luria, A. R. Osnovyi neyropsihologii [Basics of Neuropsychology]. Prosveshcheniye: Moscow, 2004, 384. (In Russian)
21. Zhavoronkova, L. A.; Kuptsova, S. B.; Zharikova, A. V.; Kushnir, E. M.; & Mikhalkova, A. Harakteristika izmeneniy reaktivnosti EEG pri vyipolnenii dvoynyih zadaniy u zdorovyih sub'ektov (dobrovolnyiy posturalnyiy kontrol i raschet). [Characteristics of changes in EEG reactivity when performing double tasks in healthy objects (voluntary postural control and calculation]. Human Physiology. 2011, 37(6), 688–699. DOI: 10.1134/S0362119711060168 (In Russian)

Published

2020-10-07

How to Cite

Bezkopylna, S. (2020). Age features of reactivity of the autonomic nervous system during the processing of information of different modality and intensity of signal presentation. Notes in Current Biology, (1(389), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.29038/2617-4723-2020-1-389-94-101